More from Japan

Here is an interesting piece from Spend Matters on the broader implications of the supply chain disruptions in Japan.  Regardless of whether or not companies have a direct interest in Japanese suppliers, potential supply chain shortages are a concern for the medium term, particularly in the electronic and automotive industries.

What we are seeing now are the immediate risks of supply base consolidation and over-reliance on one geographic region for key components.  More reasons to consider supplier development efforts as part of a long term strategy for maintaining continuity of supply.

Why Supply Chain Planning Matters

The current crisis in Japan underscores the need for proper contingency planning in supply chain management.  Far too often companies are unprepared for major supply disruptions, causing product and service shortages and leading to significant price spikes.  Supply chain managers should consider these risks, however remote they may be, and develop contingency plans that can be put into action quickly to reduce the impact of localized supply disruptions.

To be effective these back-up plans should consider the levels of impact that are possible depending on the scale of the emergency.  Additional sources of supply should be found in geographically separated locations.  It does no good to have alternative suppliers if they are all faced with the same natural disaster, as appears to be the case in the electronics industry at present.  It is also important to test your contingency plan in advance to ensure that it will be an effective response and adequately maintain your continuity of supply.

How your supply chain responds in moments of crisis and supply shortage can provide signifcant competitive advantage around price and availability.  It’s worth the long-term investment in  some emergency preparedness planning.

Procurement Software Trends

Software Advice has put out a great piece on the current trends in procurement software.  Looks like demand for procurement software is expected to increase over the next year, could be a good sign that the economy is back on track.

GAO Report Confirms Government Program Redundancy

Last week’s release of the 300+ page GAO report on redundant government programs is another reminder of the fact that we have known for a long time. There is a substantial amount of duplicative efforts and programs in the U.S. Government budget. The report noted duplication in scores of programs such as small business innovation programs, minority business support, and military vehicle procurement to name a few.

Why can’t the Congress require a full-up review of these programs? I would suggest reverting back to a zero-based budget, updated yearly. I think that this would root out the duplication and force the Government Program Managers to show the return on investment of all programs above a certain dollar threshold. In addition, the evaluation of duplication can then be easily accomplished by the Congressional Budget Office.

One more time: How can we move ahead with reducing Government program duplication. Zero-based budgeting should be welcomed back!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.